Investments: does social responsibility really increase financial profitability?



This article examines how ESG factors affect the financial efficiency of investments. The article analyzes scientific research studying the relationship between ESG indicators and financial results of companies. Methodological approaches are also evaluated and the factors that influence the results are highlighted.

Keywords: ESG investments, financial profitability, social responsibility, corporate sustainability, environmental management, social impact, corporate governance.

В этой статье рассматривается, как факторы ESG влияют на финансовую эффективность инвестиций. Анализируются научные исследования, изучающие связь между ESG-показателями и финансовыми итогами компаний. Также оцениваются методологические подходы и выделяются факторы, которые оказывают влияние на результаты.

Ключевые слова: ESG-инвестиции, финансовая доходность, социальная ответственность, корпоративная устойчивость, экологическое управление, социальное воздействие, корпоративное управление.

In recent years, ESG investing (Environmental, Social and Management Factors) has become popular among investors worldwide. This method includes the analysis of environmental, social and managerial aspects in making investment decisions, rather than relying solely on traditional financial parameters. The increased interest in ESG investments is due to the fact that companies that are able to effectively manage risks and opportunities in the field of ESG often show more sustainable and long-term financial results. Nevertheless, the question of whether social responsibility and concern for the environment really contribute to improving financial profitability remains the subject of active discussion and research.

The idea of ESG investing is based on the fact that companies with sound environmental and social risk management, as well as high corporate governance standards, have a better chance of success in the long term [1]. This is due to several key aspects:

— companies dealing with environmental issues and social responsibility are less likely to face environmental disasters, lawsuits, regulatory fines and reputational losses [2].

— Environmentally responsible companies often show better results due to lower resource costs and reduced waste [3].

— companies with a good reputation in the field of social responsibility are able to attract and retain more qualified and motivated staff [4].

— companies that take care of the needs of customers, suppliers and local communities create stronger and more trusting relationships, which contributes to their sustainability and development [5].

— ESG indicators are increasingly being paid attention to when choosing investment sites, which gives companies with high results in this area easier access to financing and reduces the cost of raising capital [6].

Thus, ESG investing shows that taking into account non-financial factors can help improve financial performance by reducing risks, increasing efficiency and strengthening the reputation of firms.

Despite the extensive literature on the impact of ESG on companies' financial results, no consensus has been reached in this area [7]. There are conflicting data: some studies confirm a positive correlation between high ESG indicators and improved financial efficiency, citing the example of increased profitability and stock price [9]. Others, on the contrary, point to a potential decrease in profitability due to additional costs and limitations associated with ESG investing [8]. The third group of studies does not find a statistically significant relationship between ESG and financial performance, explaining this by the complexity and multifactorial impact of ESG [11].

Research results on the relationship between ESG estimates and the financial performance of companies can vary significantly depending on the methods used in the analyses. There are several key factors to consider when interpreting these results.

First, the choice of specific ESG indicators is important. Different rating agencies and indexes offer their own estimates of ESG factors, and the choice of a particular source can significantly affect the results of the study. This is because agencies use different methodologies and criteria to evaluate companies [9].

Secondly, it is necessary to pay attention to the choice of financial indicators. The financial performance of companies can be assessed based on criteria such as return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), share price, and revenue growth. Different indicators can reflect different aspects of financial activity and, consequently, affect the results [13].

The third important aspect is data analysis methods. Depending on the statistical methods used, such as regression analysis or time series analysis, the conclusions may vary. Each method has its own assumptions and limitations, which also need to be considered.

The fourth factor is the consideration of control variables. Analyzing the relationship between ESG indicators and financial performance requires taking into account additional factors such as industry, company size, and the state of the economy. Ignoring these variables can lead to distortion of the research results.

Also, the issue of causality is also relevant. The correlation between ESG indicators and financial results does not always indicate a causal relationship. Companies with high financial efficiency may have more resources to invest in ESG, or other factors, such as the quality of management, may simultaneously affect both groups of indicators [2].

Thus, when analyzing research in the field of ESG investing, it is important to take into account methodological aspects and critically perceive the results obtained.

Despite the inconsistency of the data, the analysis allows us to identify a number of key factors that determine the relationship between ESG indicators and financial results of companies. These include industry specifics, geographical location, investment time horizon, and the quality of corporate governance. The influence of ESG factors on financial efficiency varies significantly depending on these parameters [4]. For example, companies operating in environmentally sensitive sectors such as oil and gas and mining can benefit more from environmentally responsible management than businesses in less risky industries. Similarly, in countries with developed environmental legislation and a high level of social responsibility, companies with high ESG indicators can show better results [15]. In addition, short-term investments in ESG may temporarily reduce profitability due to additional costs, but in the long term they contribute to increased profitability by reducing risks, improving operational efficiency and improving reputation. Finally, the quality of management plays a crucial role: companies with effective management better integrate ESG factors into their activities, which has a positive effect on their financial performance.

ESG investing is showing steady growth and is attracting more and more attention from investors around the world. In the future, investments in companies with high ESG indicators are expected to increase, due to the growing awareness of the importance of these factors. At the same time, ESG standards and ratings will be improved, aimed at increasing their rigor and transparency, which will make it easier for investors to evaluate companies. The integration of ESG factors will become an integral part of investment strategies, and will not be limited to the creation of specialized funds [5]. New financial instruments will appear, such as green and social bonds, as well as sustainable loans that stimulate the financing of projects focused on solving environmental and social problems.

The issue of the impact of social responsibility on financial profitability remains controversial. Research analysis shows an ambiguous relationship between ESG indicators and financial results of companies. Some studies point to a positive correlation, others to a negative one, and still others do not reveal a significant relationship.

Despite this, ESG investing has the potential to increase financial returns in the long run. Companies that effectively manage environmental and social risks and adhere to high standards of corporate governance have a better chance of success [6].

When analyzing research in the field of ESG investment, it is important to take into account methodological features and critically evaluate the conclusions, taking into account industry specifics, regional differences, the investment horizon and the quality of management.

In conclusion, ESG investing is a promising area that will continue to develop and attract more and more supporters. Investors who take into account ESG factors can not only make a profit, but also contribute to solving global environmental and social problems.

References:

1. Attig, N., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Suh, J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and credit ratings. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4), 679–694.
2. Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304–1320.
3. Chatterji, A. K., Durand, R., Levine, D. I., & Touboul, S. (2016). Do ratings of corporate social responsibility converge? Implications for stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 37(12), 2457–2468.
4. Derwall, J., Koedijk, K., & ter Horst, J. (2011). A tale of values-driven and profit-seeking social investors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(8), 2137–2147.
5. Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2013). The Performance Frontier: Linking Sustainability to Financial Performance. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 50–60.
6. Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 621–640.
7. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
8. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233.
9. Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5–31.
10. McKinsey & Company. (2019). Five ways that ESG creates value.
11. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.
12. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.
13. Renneboog, L., ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1723–1742.
14. Revelli, C., & Viviani, J. L. (2015). Financial performance of socially responsible investing (SRI): What have we learned? A meta-analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(2), 158–185.
15. Weber, O. (2017). Sustainability and corporate social responsibility: Integrating sustainability into business. Springer.