Авторы: Кондранова Анастасия Михайловна, Куимова Марина Валерьевна

Рубрика: Экология

Опубликовано в Молодой учёный №8 (88) апрель-2 2015 г.

Дата публикации: 18.04.2015

Статья просмотрена: 26 раз

Библиографическое описание:

Кондранова А. М., Куимова М. В. Nuclear energy: is it good or bad for the environment? // Молодой ученый. — 2015. — №8. — С. 388-390.

I’ve always been concerned about global warming.

It seemed to me like working in nuclear power was a logical way

to do something to help the environment

Leslie Dewan

Currently the percentage of nuclear energy production is rather low in the world, but it is likely to go up in the years to come. Russia is one of the countries that produces electricity from nuclear energy. Advanced, innovative nuclear technologies and engineering constructions are used for the production of nuclear fuel. However, the production of nuclear energy is not the main source of energy due to a number of drawbacks:

-        high cost of the construction of nuclear power plants and insurance of safety and reliability;

-        nuclear waste (people and the environment must be protected from the radioactive waste. It is to be isolated and dealt with safety);

-        high cost of storage and disposal of the radioactive waste (nuclear waste decays slowly and is of serious hazard for thousands of years);

-        risks of waste leaks and transportation mishaps;

-        release of radioactive gases to the atmosphere;

-        danger of accidents (terror attacks, volcanic eruption, earthquakes, tsunami, flooding, tornados, etc.) [5, 9, 10].

Nuclear accidents in Chernobyl and Fukushima caused dramatic after-effects due to the release of radioactive materials. It takes years to restore the environment and people’s health [1]. It is noteworthy that nuclear wastes are hazardous for many years and present a huge threat to our future generations. Moreover, nuclear energy facilities may be transferred from civil to military aims to contribute to the proliferation of weapons. Nuclear power plants must be well secured as not to become the target of terrorist organizations [7]. To avoid and minimize all possible dangers, the production and management of nuclear energy must be a high and achievable priority in the countries with nuclear power plants.

However, there are sound offsetting justifications for the production of nuclear energy and operation of nuclear power plants:

-        does not require a large area for the construction and work;

-        does not depend on weather, like solar or wind, or hydroelectric plants;

-        produces a million times more energy in comparison with wind or hydro turbines;

-        does not produce carbon dioxide;

-        does not emit gases and smoke particles;

-        produces a relatively small volume of waste, although it is highly radioactive [6, 7, 8].

These benefits give some researcher the presumption to claim that nuclear energy is the way to stop global warming as they do not emit green house gases [2, 3, 4].

There is no unique solution to the problem of nuclear energy. Nuclear power plants produce electricity without greenhouse gas emissions which gives it environmental advantages over fossil fuels. At the same time, there are numerous moral, ethical and spiritual reasons against nuclear energy, as accidents may lead to catastrophic consequences both to peoples’ lives and to the environment. Moreover, there are challenging issues that the nuclear industry faces: scarce resources of uranium on earth, storage of nuclear waste, security concerns, etc.




1.      Сидоренко В. А. Безопасность использования атомной (ядерной) энергии (ядерная безопасность) // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. Серия: Физика ядерных реакторов. 2012. № 1. С. 3–17.

2.      How nuclear power can stop global warming. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-nuclear-power-can-stop-global-warming/ (accessed April 12, 2015).

3.      Is nuclear power a global warming solution? http://timeforchange.org/pros-cons-nuclear-power-global-warming-solution (accessed April 12, 2015).

4.      Is nuclear power safe for humans and the environment? http://alternativeenergy.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001270 (accessed April 12, 2015).

5.      Johnson T. Nuclear power safety concerns // Сиббезопасность-Спассиб. 2011. № 1. С. 172–176.

6.      Nuclear energy. http://www.conserve-energy-future.com/Advantages_NuclearEnergy.php (accessed April 12, 2015).

7.      Nuclear power and weapons — explaining the connections. http://www.foe.org.au/anti-nuclear/issues/nfc/power-weapons/civmil (accessed April 12, 2015).

8.      Nuclear power is the greenest option, say top scientists http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/nuclear-power-is-the-greenest-option-say-top-scientists-9955997.html (accessed April 12, 2015).

9.      Radioactive waste management. http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Nuclear-Fuel-Cycle/Nuclear-Wastes/Radioactive-Waste-Management/ (accessed April 12, 2015).

10.  Radioactive wastes — myths and realities. http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Nuclear-Fuel-Cycle/Nuclear-Wastes/Radioactive-Wastes---Myths-and-Realities/ (accessed April 12, 2015).


Основные термины (генерируются автоматически): nuclear energy, nuclear power plants, global warming, nuclear energy production, nuclear waste decays, nuclear energy facilities, innovative nuclear technologies, high cost, radioactive waste, sound offsetting justifications, relatively small volume, global warming solution, Сидоренко В. А., greenhouse gas emissions, nuclear fuel, Nuclear accidents, nuclear wastes, radioactive gases, nuclear industry, radioactive materials.


Социальные комментарии Cackle
Задать вопрос