Introduction. Amidst the varying interpretations, the majority of researchers agree that gamification does not refer to the use of real games [3] A strategy for conducting creative lessons by integrating various visual elements and interactive components. This definition of gamification is not limited to the field of education; it is widely applied in marketing, healthcare, business, and conferences. College faculty, learning professionals, and others in the field of learning and education must gain knowledge of how gamification techniques can be used in a variety of settings to improve learning, retention, and application of knowledge [2] According to statistical data from the past five years, the usage rate of gamification methods in the education sector of Kazakhstan stands at approximately 30–40 %. This is 41 % lower compared to the United States. In the USA, game elements are not merely a supplementary method but a core component of the educational system.According to our survey, the primary issue in Kazakhstan is that while over 70 % of teachers are willing to incorporate game technologies into their lessons, only 40 % do so on a regular basis. This indicates a gap in pedagogical methodology despite the abundance of theoretical knowledge. Furthermore, since most representatives of Generation Z are hyperactive, their level of engagement significantly decreases if the lesson is not interesting or motivational. The main objective of this article is to identify specific models and algorithms that are practical for teachers to use. It aims to demonstrate through empirical research how the use of game elements enhances students' academic performance, communication skills, teamwork, and motivation. Additionally, the study identifies which gamification platforms are most effective for students.

As noted by Sandrone and Carlson [4], gamification should not be used 'for the sake of the process,' but for the sake of measurable results. The ultimate goal remains the achievement of high-quality educational outcomes and the mastery of the subject matter. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to identify effective digital models and algorithms (specifically using platforms like Bamboozle and Quizgecko) that bridge the gap between theory and practice. This study demonstrates how structured gamification enhances not only student engagement but also fosters cognitive development and self-organization within the general pedagogical framework.

Materials and Methods. The research involved a sample of 38 students aged 12–13 years. To ensure the accuracy of the comparative analysis, the participants were divided into two distinct groups: Control Group (n=20): Students taught using traditional pedagogical methods. Experimental Group (n=18): Students taught through gamification strategies. The control group followed a traditional instructional approach using the English Plus Student’s Book. In this group, the teacher delivered conventional explanations, while students took notes and completed written assignments during class. To provide some variety, occasional question-and-answer games were conducted. In contrast, the experimental group underwent a two-week intervention where game elements were integrated into every lesson. Platforms such as Baamboozle, Quizgecko, Kahoot, and Wordwall were utilized systematically. Following the curriculum outlined in the textbook, each newly introduced topic was reinforced and consolidated through these digital interactive platforms.

To gauge the perceptions of the participants, a survey was conducted among all students who took part in the experiment. The questions were specifically designed to evaluate the extent to which the teaching methods were engaging, beneficial, and motivating.

Results and Discussion . «The findings revealed a significant difference between the two pedagogical approaches. The experimental group showed a higher level of participation and academic achievement. In terms of student engagement, the experimental group showed a remarkable 38 % increase in classroom activity compared to their initial baseline. This growth confirms that game elements effectively motivate passive learners to participate more actively in the learning process. This is illustrated in Figure 1.

Fig. 1

Figure 1 illustrates the significant difference in academic performance between the two groups. The experimental group, which utilized gamification tools (Bamboozle and Quizgecko), achieved an average score of 77 %, whereas the control group followed traditional methods and averaged only 33 %. As shown in Figure 2

Fig. 2

Based on the post-experimental survey, students in the experimental group reported that the lessons over the two-week period were highly engaging, which facilitated rapid comprehension and long-term retention of the topics. Furthermore, they expressed a strong desire to incorporate board and digital games into other subjects in the future. In contrast, students in the control group indicated that they did not fully understand the new topics covered during the two weeks. Notably, those who did not actively participate in class were unable to recall the specific topics that had been taught.

Conclusion. The research findings clearly demonstrate that gamification is one of the most effective methods for enhancing student motivation, academic achievement, and classroom engagement. Specifically, the Quizgecko platform proved to be a comprehensive tool, providing all necessary functionalities for both individual and collaborative work. This study proves that gamification is not merely a recreational activity but a highly productive pedagogical method that warrants permanent integration into daily lesson planning.

For today’s hyperactive Generation Z learners, gamification increased academic interest by 38 %, effectively channeling their surplus energy into productive learning outcomes. Furthermore, the gamified environment allowed students to feel at ease, reducing the fear of making mistakes and significantly enhancing their communication skills. Beyond academic scores, it was observed that this method fosters essential soft skills, including leadership, critical thinking, and time management.

Importantly, gamification should not complicate the teaching process; instead, it must serve as a tool that optimizes a teacher's workload and saves time. Given that 70 % of educators are willing to adopt these methods, it is recommended to establish specialized training courses focused on mastering new technologies to ensure multifaceted professional growth.

In the future, gamification should transition from being a tool reserved for occasional «open lessons» to a consistent, year-long educational system. Additionally, there is a clear necessity to develop a multifunctional, user-friendly platform specifically tailored to meet the needs of educators in Kazakhstan.

References:

1. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification / S. Deterding, D. Dixon, R. Khaled, L. Nacke. — Текст: непосредственный // Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference. — New York: ACM, 2011. — С. 9–15.
2. Kapp The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education / Kapp, M. K. — 1st ed. — San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 2012. — 336 с. — Текст: непосредственный.
3. Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification / K. Robson, K. Plangger, J. H. Kietzmann [и др.]. — Текст: непосредственный // Business Horizons. — 2015. — № 4. — С. 411–420.
4. Sandrone, S. Gamification in education: A systematic review / S. Sandrone, C. Carlson. — Текст: непосредственный // Medical Teacher. — 2021. — № 1. — С. 78–84.
5. Ryan, R. M. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions / R. M. Ryan, E. L. Deci. — Текст: непосредственный // Contemporary Educational Psychology. — 2000. — № 1. — С. 54–67.